America's Energy Policy: A letter to the editor
For anyone who might have missed it, below is a copy of Jerry Oppenheim and Theo MacGregor's 10/27/05 Letter to the Editor in the Gloucester Daily Times. Visit Theo and Jerry's website here.
America needs a new energy policy
To the editor:
Your editorial of Sept. 29 on a "sensible, reasoned energy policy" included a nod to conservation, but that is where the reason seems to end. The policy recommendations focus on increasing supplies of oil and natural gas at the expense of the environment, including drilling in Alaska. The editorial asserts that "modern technology can extract vast quantities of oil from a minimal footprint on the environment," but that this has been opposed by "concerns over caribou living in a wilderness that few will ever see win the day." However, the U.S. Geological Service estimates that only seven months of economically recoverable oil exists in the Arctic National Wildlife refuge, and it would take 10 years to get it. As for a "small footprint," according to the National Resources Defense Council, "U.S. Geological Survey studies have found that oil in the refuge isn't concentrated in a single, large reservoir. Rather, it's spread across the coastal plain in more than 30 small deposits, which would ... fragment the habitat, disturbing and displacing wildlife."
Continue reading "America's Energy Policy: A letter to the editor" »
